<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for J C Martin and Associates Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jcmartinassociates.co.uk/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jcmartinassociates.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HMRC Admit PAYE Coding Errors by Peter Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.jcmartinassociates.co.uk/blog/2010/04/23/hmrc-admit-paye-coding-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jcmartinassociates.co.uk/blog/2010/04/23/hmrc-admit-paye-coding-errors/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>The fact that so many individuals have had incorrect PAYE Codings for 2010/2011 can only be due to the fact that the New PAYE System, which was developed by HMRC, delivers incorrect information to the simple process of Annual Coding. This indicates that the basic requirements of the PAYE system were either incorrectly interpreted by the IT partner of HMRC OR were incorrectly stated by HMRC.
Either way HMRC must accept responsibility for allowing a national system to be introduced without adequate and proper testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that so many individuals have had incorrect PAYE Codings for 2010/2011 can only be due to the fact that the New PAYE System, which was developed by HMRC, delivers incorrect information to the simple process of Annual Coding. This indicates that the basic requirements of the PAYE system were either incorrectly interpreted by the IT partner of HMRC OR were incorrectly stated by HMRC.<br />
Either way HMRC must accept responsibility for allowing a national system to be introduced without adequate and proper testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Paternity Rights From 6 April 2010 by JOHNSON</title>
		<link>http://www.jcmartinassociates.co.uk/blog/2010/04/08/new-paternity-rights-from-6-april-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHNSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jcmartinassociates.co.uk/blog/?p=18#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Excellently written. Thank you for your knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellently written. Thank you for your knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

